Spam, Spam, Everywhere!
#21
Posted 30 November 2006 - 12:09 AM
#22
Posted 30 November 2006 - 12:36 AM
#23
Posted 30 November 2006 - 01:20 PM
#24
Posted 30 November 2006 - 08:02 PM
.Saru, I agree with this. GP is the same. But for whatever reason, GP is VERY lucky... these scripts seem to join but not post on GP. Feel free to have a nosey in the ACP settings to see if there's anything you can do here to try to stop them posting...It's most annoying thoughThe spam problem is getting worse everywhere, UM is getting inundated with spammers and it's a constant struggle to deal with them. Given the size of GM i'm surprised there are so many here.
#25
Posted 30 November 2006 - 11:49 PM
#26
Posted 01 December 2006 - 06:23 AM
Edited by Snowbaby, 01 December 2006 - 12:02 PM.
#27
Posted 01 December 2006 - 03:43 PM
I think a lot of them are actually humans rather than bots, people in some countries get paid to post a spam message on x number of on-line forums in return for a fixed sum. ..The CAPTCHA and e-mail validation systems should keep the automatic bots out, with any luck.Saru, I agree with this. GP is the same. But for whatever reason, GP is VERY lucky... these scripts seem to join but not post on GP. Feel free to have a nosey in the ACP settings to see if there's anything you can do here to try to stop them posting.
#28
Posted 01 December 2006 - 04:09 PM
.have these been installed or are you thinking about applying them here Saru?I think a lot of them are actually humans rather than bots, people in some countries get paid to post a spam message on x number of on-line forums in return for a fixed sum. ..The CAPTCHA and e-mail validation systems should keep the automatic bots out, with any luck.
.
{C}{C}"entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"{C}{C}.
.
{C}{C}{C}{C}Beware of the 'lie' in 'Believe'...
#29
Posted 01 December 2006 - 05:45 PM
Oh, good. Upgraded hardware!I think a lot of them are actually humans rather than bots, people in some countries get paid to post a spam message on x number of on-line forums in return for a fixed sum. ..The CAPTCHA and e-mail validation systems should keep the automatic bots out, with any luck.
#30
Posted 02 December 2006 - 10:24 AM
#32
Posted 04 December 2006 - 02:18 PM
.I just deleted another one too, the bad thing is is that they are posting images now too, not just links... :unsure:Seems they are still getting in. I just deleted two porn related posts.
.
{C}{C}"entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"{C}{C}.
.
{C}{C}{C}{C}Beware of the 'lie' in 'Believe'...
#33
Posted 04 December 2006 - 03:54 PM
#34
Posted 04 December 2006 - 08:55 PM
.Good lord! Hopefully next time Saru logs in, he'll see if there's anything else can be done. It's so frustrating, here we are, a bunch of people just wanting to share experiences and discussion, and this is what we have to see on our purty likkle board. Makes me madI just deleted another one too, the bad thing is is that they are posting images now too, not just links... :unsure:
#35
Posted 04 December 2006 - 10:49 PM
.
{C}{C}"entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"{C}{C}.
.
{C}{C}{C}{C}Beware of the 'lie' in 'Believe'...
#36
Posted 05 December 2006 - 11:40 AM
#37
Posted 05 December 2006 - 03:59 PM
.well, we'll keep a close watch on that, I am glad that the members have also been reporting the spammers, which shows what a responsible bunch they are.Tell me about it... It gives such a bad impression. I hope no-one comes to the site and see's jessica alba's kebab and thinks its not a very family orientated site. I think the usual spam is almost forgivable but the pictures are getting out of control, I know theres quite a few younger users on this site and it really would be sad if they left or stopped visiting because of parental concerns etc....
.
{C}{C}"entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"{C}{C}.
.
{C}{C}{C}{C}Beware of the 'lie' in 'Believe'...
#38
Posted 06 December 2006 - 03:19 PM
#39
Posted 08 December 2006 - 10:07 PM
#40
Posted 12 December 2006 - 12:04 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














